Style Switcher

Predefined Colors

Human Vortex: What is Human Being?

We are vortices.  To be a human being is to be a human vortex.

From ultra-large black holes to the water swirling down a sink drain, vortices are common.  They are composed of a still center around which stuff swirls.

BEING AND BECOMING

Every human being instantiates two dimensions:  Becoming and Being.  (It’s wonderful that the two-word phrase ‘human being’ in English captures both dimensions.)

Becoming is composed of all forms (objects, things).  To be a form is to be part of Becoming.  Whether existent or nonexistent, a form is anything that may be thought about (made an object of awareness, singled out for attention).  If we think of ourselves as like tornadoes, our forms are all the swirling, moving stuff on the outside of the tornado:  all thoughts, perceptions, emotions, bodies, and so on.

All forms are temporal.  All forms are impermanent.  Whether they in fact change or not, all are subject to change or flux.

(The only exceptions may be abstract conceptualizations that are necessarily true or necessarily false propositions about relations between properties such as “red is a color” that are true whether or not any red or colored individuals exist.  Philosophers have debated about the existence and meaning of such propositions and the existence or nonexistence of the properties they are about. Outside philosophical disciplines such as ontology and the philosophy of mathematics, nobody pays much attention to “conceptual” forms.)

Being is formlessness.  There are no forms in Being.  It is emptiness (stillness, void, “silence”).

Being is eternal.

[For another post on the Being/Becoming distinctions, click here.]

 

PERSON

A human being is often called a “person.”  So, a person as human participates in Becoming and as being participates in Being.  We humans are both temporal and non-temporal (eternal).

This is a familiar idea.  Many sages and thinkers have stated it in various ways.

Please do not make the common mistake of confusing what is immortal with what is eternal.  To be immortal is to be non-mortal, in other words, to be something that will not die.  To be eternal is to be non-temporal, to be “outside” time (perhaps, like a number [not a numeral]).  So, for example, an entity that existed at all times would not be eternal.

DEATH

What, though, about the instability of being a human being?  Since a human being is partially form and since all forms are impermanent, a human being must be impermanent or unstable.

Death is the end of a human being’s instability.

The important confusion about death is the belief that death is the opposite of life.  It’s not.  Death is the opposite of birth.  The birth of a human being is the temporal beginning of that person and its death is its temporal end.

Life is Being.  Because Being is eternal and life is Being, life neither begins to be nor ceases to be; it is subject neither to birth nor to death.

The important clue here is the redemptive quality of death or, even, of little deaths such as important losses like the loss of a parent, loss of a child, loss of a lover, loss of a friend, loss of a fortune, loss of health, or loss of a home.  There’s always a silver lining accompanying any loss.

IDENTIFICATION

When we think we are something, we identify with it.  It’s natural to identify with our bodies, our thoughts, our emotions, our experiences, and so on.  Yes, they are parts of us.  Each of us human beings has a particular “form identity.”  Each of us is a set of unique forms in Becoming.

We also have an “essence identity,” in other words, we should also identify with Being becasue each of us is also Being.  There’s no separation (and, so, no dissatisfaction or suffering) in Being.

Those persons who do not identify with Being are spiritual zeros who just believe themselves to be nothing but a particular set of forms.  It’s not that believing “I am a unique set of forms” is wrong; as far as it goes, it’s true.  It’s just that it’s radically incomplete.  Why?  Whether human or nonhuman, each unique set of forms is also Being.  Because that is so, our selves or egos are really delusions.

Believing ourselves to be only forms is like identifying a vortex only with the swirling stuff while ignoring its center.  Without the center, there’d be no vortex.  It’s essential.

Actually, it’s primary.  Without Being, there could be no human being.

The idea of spiritual awakening comes from identifying with (usually with an intensity called “realizing”) our essence identity as well as with our form identity.

As Panayot Butchvarov argues in Being Qua Being), material identity judgments, which have the logical form “this is that”, are not made on the basis of evidence.  So, if you question it (as you should!), there is no evidence, either demonstrative or nondemonstrative, that could be marshaled here or elsewhere to support the identification of a person with Being.  (Don’t let such questioning degenerate into mere negativity; instead, find out for yourself.)

On the other hand, a nonconceptual realization of Being is as much direct proof as anyone could ever want.  Since all conceptual thinking is discursive and Being is unitary, conceptual thinking cannot think Being.  (Actually, Being is beyond all conceptualizations such as unitary/nonunitary; language here is just a pointer.)

Our only apprehension of Being can be nonconceptual, which is why some contemporary sages such as Eckhart Tolle emphasize dropping all thoughts in favor of thoughtless awareness.

Thoughtless awareness of Being is not something that needs to be gained.  It’s always been “beneath” conceptual awareness.  Obviously, it’s impossible to have an intelligible thought of thoughtless awareness.

So, it’s impossible to think one’s way to an apprehension of Being.

The only way to apprehend it is to drop all thoughts (conceptualizations, judgments).  Dropping all thoughts even momentarily provides a sufficient glimpse.

If you doubt your essence identity, simply drop all thoughts and that doubt will disappear.  Either you’ll do that or you’ll never apprehend your own nature.

[For another post on realizing essence identity, click here.]

Without apprehending your own nature, your life will never be very satisfactory.  No matter how much worldly success you may enjoy, a sense of completion or fulfillment will always elude you.

After apprehending your own nature, life will be much easier and peaceful as well as more loving, joyful, and creative.

Realizing essence identity is the end of ego delusion.  Since all dissatisfaction requires ego delusion, wholly realizing essence identity is the end of all dissatisfaction.

TAKEAWAY

Either open to Being or remain perpetually dissatisfied.

Trying to live well without realizing essence identity is like trying to win a fist fight with one arm strapped to your side.

Recommended reading:   Are You Living Without Purpose?

Related website:     ConsultingPhilosopher.com

 

 

 

 

 

Posted in spiritual well-beingTagged , , , , , , ,

ONE COMMENT

sharon - posted on 18/01/2018 11:11 am

very informative post on the difference between between being and becoming…especially helpful with the click to the post bifurcation of reality….phoenix rising from the ashes came to mind?….


Post a Comment

*